ABSTRACT
Objectives The prevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 among blood donors in China remains unknown. To reveal the missing information, we investigated the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among blood donors in the cities of Wuhan, Shenzhen, and Shijiazhuang of China. Design Cross-sectional study Setting Three blood centers, located in the central, south and north China, respectively, recruiting from January to April 2020. Participants 38,144 healthy blood donors donated in Wuhan, Shenzhen and Shijiazhuang were enrolled, who were all met the criteria for blood donation during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Main outcome measures Specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 including total antibody (TAb), IgG antibody against receptor-binding domain of spike protein (IgG-RBD) and nucleoprotein (IgG-N), and IgM. Pseudotype lentivirus-based neutralization test was performed on all TAb-positive samples. In addition, anonymous personal demographic information, including gender, age, ethnicity, occupation and educational level, and blood type were collected. Results A total of 519 samples from 410 donors were confirmed by neutralization tests. The SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among blood donors was 2.29% (407/17,794, 95%CI: 2.08% to 2.52%) in Wuhan, 0.029% (2/6,810, 95%CI: 0.0081% to 0.11%) in Shenzhen, and 0.0074% (1/13,540, 95%CI: 0.0013% to 0.042%) in Shijiazhuang, respectively. The earliest emergence of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in blood donors was identified on January 20, 2020 in Wuhan. The weekly prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Wuhan's blood donors changed dynamically and were 0.08% (95%CI: 0.02% to 0.28%) during January 15 to 22 (before city lockdown), 3.08% (95%CI: 2.67% to 3.55%) during January 23 to April 7 (city quarantine period) and 2.33% (95%CI: 2.06% to 2.63%) during April 8 to 30 (after lockdown easing). Female and older-age were identified to be independent risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among donors in Wuhan. Conclusions The prevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 among blood donors in China was low, even in Wuhan city. According to our data, the earliest emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan's donors should not earlier than January, 2020. As most of the population of China remained uninfected during the early wave of COVID-19 pandemic, effective public health measures are still certainly required to block viral spread before a vaccine is widely available.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational DiseasesABSTRACT
Background A pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is on-going. Clinical characters of afebrile cases infected with SARS-CoV-2 remain poorly understood and informations are limited on the duration of SARS-CoV-2 viral positivity.Methods We performed a single-center retrospective study of 143 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 26 to April 15, 2020. Differences were compared among patients with/without fever. Risk factors for the duration of SARS-CoV-2 viral positivity were evaluated.Results A total of 143 patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test were enrolled, including 38 afebrile patients and 105 febrile patients. On admission, a total of 40 (28%) patients had leukopenia, 44 (30.8%) had lymphopenia and 8 (5.6%) had thrombocytopenia. 78 patients (54.5%) had decreased T lymphocytes and 105 patients (73.4%) had decreased CD4+T lymphocytes. Compared with febrile cases, afebrile patients had a significantly higher white blood cell count (P = 0.02), total lymphocytes (P < 0.01), platelet count (P < 0.01), T lymphocytes (P < 0.01) and CD8+ T lymphocytes (P = 0.02). The median SARS-CoV-2 viral positivity duration of these 143 patients was 14 days (IQR, 10-30 days) and for febrile and afebrile group were 13 days (IQR, 10-29 days) and 20 days (IQR, 11-31 days) respectively. Multivariate Cox regression results showed that the fever [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, P < 0.01]and higher count of platelet (HR = 5.47, P = 0.02) were the predominant risk factor for the SARS-CoV-2 viral positivity duration.Conclusion The SARS-CoV-2 virial positivity duration of the afebrile group was significantly longer than that in the febrile group. Fever and a higher count of platelet were the independent protective factors for a shorter SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity duration.
Subject(s)
Thrombocytopenia , Leukopenia , Fever , COVID-19 , LymphopeniaABSTRACT
【Background】Recent studies reported that patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) might have liver injury. However, few data on the combined analysis and change patterns of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin (TBil) have been shown.【Methods】 This is a single-center retrospective study. A total of 105 adult patients hospitalized for confirmed COVID-19 in Beijing Ditan Hospital between January 12, and March 17, 2020 were included, and divided into mild and severe groups. We compared liver functional test results between the two groups. Category of ALT change during the disease course was also examined.【Results】 56.2% of the patients had unnormal ALT, AST, or total TBil throughout the course of the disease, but in 91.4% cases the level of ALT, AST or TBil ≤ 3 fold of the upper normal range. The overall distribution of ALT, AST, and TBil were all significantly difference between mild and severe group (p<0.05).The percentage of the patients with both elevated ALT and AST was 12.7% in mild cases vs. 46.2% in severe cases (p = 0.001). 34.6% severe group patients started to have abnormal ALT after admission，and 73.4% of all patients had normal ALT before discharge.【Conclusion】Elevated liver function index is very common in patients with COVID-19 infection, and the level were less than 3 × ULN，but most are reversible. The abnormality of 2 or more indexes is low in the patients with COVID-19, but it is more likely to occur in the severe group.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: Severe ill patients with 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection progressed rapidly to acute respiratory failure. We aimed to select the most useful prognostic factor for severe illness incidence. Methods: The study prospectively included 61 patients with 2019-nCoV infection treated at Beijing Ditan Hospital from January 13, 2020 to January 31, 2020. Prognostic factor of severe illness was selected by the LASSO COX regression analyses, to predict the severe illness probability of 2019-CoV pneumonia. The predictive accuracy was evaluated by concordance index, calibration curve, decision curve and clinical impact curve. Results: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was identified as the independent risk factor for severe illness in patients with 2019-nCoV infection. The NLR had a c-index of 0.807 (95% confidence interval, 0.676-0.38), the calibration curves fitted well, and the decision curve and clinical impact curve showed that the NLR had superior standardized net benefit. In addition, the incidence of severe illness was 9.1% in age [≥] 50 and NLR < 3.13 patients, and half of patients with age [≥] 50 and NLR [≥] 3.13 would develop severe illness. Based on the risk stratification of NLR with age, the study developed a 2019-nCoV pneumonia management process. Conclusions: The NLR was the early identification of risk factors for 2019-nCoV severe illness. Patients with age [≥] 50 and NLR [≥] 3.13 facilitated severe illness, and they should rapidly access to intensive care unit if necessary.